Join us   Log in  

Publication Ethics

To ensure the high-quality of articles published, IJAMT journal follow certain ethical standards. To maintain these standards we provide certain guidelines for the reviewers, authors, and the publishers.

Reviewer Authors Editor

Peer Review: In the blind peer review process reviewers decide on the articles on the grounds of originality, novelty and plagiarism.
Article Standard: Authors should submit an accurate account of their original research as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Role: The Editorial Committee is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
Prompt Review: prompt delivery of responses to enable the article publication without any delay. Plagiarism: Work should be their own, not been plagiarized and not violating the copyrights.
Fair Play: Editorial decisions should be objective, autonomous and non discriminatory on the basis of nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, or religion of the authors.
Confidentiality:Information, novel ideas or content are kept confidential and should not used for personal advantage. Redundant Publication: Author should not publish the same article in multiple journals or publication venues.
Confidentiality: They should ensure that any unpublished material disclosed in a manuscript not be used by anyone who can access the manuscript.
Standards of Objectivity:Comments are posted with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of Sources:Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Relevant published work that has not been cited by the author(s) is identified by the reviewers
Image Manipulation: Authors are requested to supply the original image data in an editable format so that images could be thoroughly
analyzed for any indication of manipulation.
Fundamental Errors In Published Works: Any significant error or inaccuracy discovered by the author in his/her own published work should be promptly notified to the Editorial Committee.


Publication Methodology

The following is the methodology adopted during the peer-review process of every manuscript submitted to the journal:

Each submitted manuscript is instantly acknowledged with a manuscript ID and further communication will be made by the corresponding authors through this manuscript ID only.

The received manuscript is checked by the editorial team to ensure its suitability under the ambit of the journal. If found suitable then appropriate reviewers will be assigned to the manuscript. If not then that manuscript will be rejected without any further processing. The identity of both, the authors and the reviewer will be encapsulated from each other.

The recommendations of the reviewers will be taken under the following status:
• Publish unedited
• Accepted with minor changes
• Accepted with major changes
• Rejected: manuscript is not technically sound

On getting response through all the reviewers, a cumulative decision will be made by the editorial team under the following status
• Publish unedited • Accepted with minor changes • Accepted with major changes • Rejected: manuscript is not technically sound

If the Editor recommends “Publish unedited,” the manuscript is accepted for publication.
If the Editor recommends “Accepted with minor changes,” the authors are notified to prepare and submit a final copy of their manuscript with the required minor changes suggested by the reviewers within a limited time frame. The Editor reviews the revised manuscript after the minor changes have been made by the authors. Once the Editor is satisfied with the final manuscript, the manuscript can be finally accepted for publication.

If the Editor recommends “Accepted with major changes,” the recommendation is communicated to the authors. The authors are expected to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the changes recommended by the reviewers and to submit their revised manuscript in a timely manner. Once the revised manuscript is submitted, the Editor can resend the manuscript to the earlier allotted reviewers. Afterwards this manuscript will be considered for the following status only:
• Publish unedited
• Accepted with minor changes
• Rejected: alteration done by the authors is not satisfying

If the Editor recommends ‘rejected’ the manuscript, the rejection is immediate.
For the finally accepted paper, a ‘proof read’ copy will be created and then send to the authors for further check. On getting reverse response from the authors, that particular manuscript will be considered for the very next issue of the journal.
A high-quality, fair, and unbiased peer-review process of every manuscript submitted to the journal is ensured, since any manuscript must be recommended by two or more reviewers usually along with the Editor of the manuscript in order for it to be accepted for publication in the journal.


Publication Charges

There is no processing/maintenance fee however over-length page charges are applicable as per the following conditions:

1. First four pages of the manuscript are free of charge
2. For Indian authors, over-length page charges are applicable @ INR 500.00 per page
3. For Foreign authors, over-length page charges are applicable @ USD 50.00 per page

Remittance process will be informed separately after the acceptance of the paper.


Google Translate

Total published articles


Search Articles

World wide visitors


Fabrication and characterisation of antennas and microwave components


Publication Statistics

Articles Statistics

Google Search

Visitor Counter

Indexed in

Coming Soon...

Manuscript Statistics

No. of online users: 17

Subscribe for TOC Alerts

Get the table of contents of current issues.

E-mail Alerts